Welcome to the DIRECTV Community Forums

Connect with users, ask questions, and find answers!

skippman's profile

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

Tuesday, September 17th, 2019 5:00 PM

Is it worth swapping out from a HR54 to a HS17 for a rack mount system?

I have a somewhat non typical installation at my house. My HS54 sits on a 20U server rack in my wiring closet where all the wire for the home comes into. From there its connected to the wireless bridge which sends the signal to my Genie Mini's, of which I have three. There is no display wired directly to the DVR nor is there really room to put one. The DVR acts as a stand alone appliance. 

 

I'm considering changing out to the HS17. The HS17 seems to have remote administrative functionality since it's a headless appliance. This would give me some direct control over the box which I do not currently have. It would also eliminate the need for the extra wireless bridge I'm using right now. I know in the beginning there were many problems being reported with it, but I'm curious if that's still the case.

ACE - Sage

 • 

46K Messages

5 years ago

If your current system is working fine, I wouldn't "upgrade" to an HS17.  I think it's still more "buggy" than the HR54.

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

I don't know that I'd say it's working correctly. I cannot stream my recordings to a mobile device for example which to me says there's a TCP/IP issue on the DVR more than likely.

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

A few additional questions.

 

1.) If I went with your plan, would the recorded content be available across the entire system. Meaning if I recorded a program on HD-DVR 1 would it be available for playback on HD-DVR 2? 

 

2.) If I move the Genie that means I would have to run coax from the dish, or the main drop in the wiring closet, to where ever the Genie goes would I not?

 

3.) The new HDDVR would also require coax be run to it as well, correct?

 

The idea behind having the DVR in the wiring closet was to completely eliminate coax from the house other than between the wiring closet and the dish itself. If I'm going to have to make several runs of coax throughout the house to do this, that will be quite impossible. This is really a question of functionality over cost.

 

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

Juniper,

 

I understand my situation is somewhat unique. My entire house is ethernet based. I removed every trace of RG-58 and RG-6 I could when we bought it. It's also a tri-level home with a finished basement. The only way to run any cables is through the attic which was a nightmare when we ran all the CAT6 in the first place. I have never used the PIP functionality, even when I had stand alone receivers at each TV in my old home as we never watch live TV, only DVR'd recordings. This might be an issue for those who watch live sports events and such, but I do not fit that demographic. Here is a picture of my wiring closet. You cannot see the wireless bridge as it sits on top of the rack, along with my router (I have the Uverse wireless disabled and the modem in bridge mode). 

 

 IMG_1773-2.jpg

 

As for the 4K receiver, you mention this needing to be hardwired. Is this COAX/MoCA dependent or can it run over Ethernet? I do not currently own a 4K TV (I have a 65" 1080P Panasonic Plasma) but am considering going to a 75" OLED display in the next year or so.

1 Attachment

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

Here's a rough layout of my network.

 

From the NID there's a homerun of CAT5E STP to the wiring closet. From there it connects to my Arris Uverse gateway. That has it's wireless turned off and is set to bridge mode. That connects to a Netgear R6300v2 router. From there I have it connected to the Netgear 24 port GigE switch (being replaced by a Dell PowerConnect 5548 managed layer 3 switch). That in turn breaks out to CAT6 run to each of the main rooms in the house (bedroom, office, etc). The DirecTV DVR connects to the switch there, as does my MyQ garage door opener and my two NAS boxes.

 

The first NAS is a QNAP TS-451+ with 4 x 6TB drives in RAID5. I've ripped every CD, DVD, and BluRay I own using MakeMKV and FLAC. This box acts as my media server.

The second NAS is a QNAP TS-421 Pro with 4 x 3TB drives in RAID5. This acts as a backup for all the PC's on the network as well as cloud storage.

 

I have a nVidia Shield TV box at each TV in the house. These are hardwired back to the switch. I use KODI to manage my media library. This way I can play back any of my movies in lossless format from any room in the house that has a TV without worrying about transcoding. Honestly, it works a lot more reliably than I ever thought possible.

 

The only real weakness in the system is the DirecTV wireless boxes seem really slow. But I suppose that's just the nature of the beast.

ACE - Master

 • 

6.5K Messages

5 years ago

for your setup you may want to consider directvnow, or some other streaming service

 

as has been said, directv is built around coax.

and as you notices the wireless is slow

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

Did some more digging. It looks like I can use DECA adapters with the HS17, which I honestly should have expected. If that's the case I can just use those and put the Genie Mini's and  HS17's Ethernet connection on it's own VLAN. Though honestly, I shouldn't need to as the QoS at the switch should handle that on it's own.

 

I'm just curious if there's a perceptible speed difference between using the boxes wirelessly vs via coax. 

ACE - Master

 • 

6.5K Messages

5 years ago

note: the hs17 is not rack mountable

and also, thats not how decas are intended to be used.

you would need one at each end of the run, so 2 per mini?

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

According to this thread the DECA adapters can absolutely be used that way. All they are is Ethernet to coax adapters. By their very nature they should be bidirectional/full duplex. It sounds like the HS17 has the ability to transmit IGMP or whatever protocol the Genie boxes use over Ethernet built in. So all I should need is a DECA adapter at each box. 

 

I plan on putting the HS17 on top of the rack. There should be enough room vertically up there for it to fit. If not, I can get one of those wall mount brackets they make for them and bolt it to the wall.

ACE - Master

 • 

6.5K Messages

5 years ago

what they can be used for and what they are designed for are 2 diff things

 

 

typical use is one connected behind a tv to coax

then connected to the tv with ethernet cable

the tv uses an rvu app for directv

 

they were also used to inject internet into the swm system

ACE - Sage

 • 

46K Messages

5 years ago


@skippman wrote:

According to this thread the DECA adapters can absolutely be used that way. All they are is Ethernet to coax adapters. By their very nature they should be bidirectional/full duplex. It sounds like the HS17 has the ability to transmit IGMP or whatever protocol the Genie boxes use over Ethernet built in. So all I should need is a DECA adapter at each box. 

 

I plan on putting the HS17 on top of the rack. There should be enough room vertically up there for it to fit. If not, I can get one of those wall mount brackets they make for them and bolt it to the wall.


Sorry, but you can't use a DECA adapter that way. 

 

Teacher

 • 

5 Messages

5 years ago

Please explain why I cannot. Have you tested this before?

ACE - Sage

 • 

46K Messages

5 years ago


@skippman wrote:

Please explain why I cannot. Have you tested this before?


Not personally. But I was part of an early beta test team for the Whole Home DVR and DECA hardware, and I know folks did try using the DECA that way. Didn't work. But feel free to give it a go and let us know what happens. 


NEED HELP?

New to the Community? Visit the Community How-To and Guidelines to get started.